Would battery operated cars be the best alternative for fuel burning cars?

Mystery questioned:

wouldn’t battery operated cars be more realistic in the possibility than ethanol and cheaper than hybrids. even if they only go about 35 mph wouldn’t it be value it to help stop global warming. they would also prevent many highway fatalities and bring auto indemnity to an all time low.
not to bring up that it would stop our dependence on unknown oil and stop the funding of terrorist organizations
come on wouldn’t it fall fatalities when you’re running 35 as a substitution for of 70 or 75
really

Could the adoption of a plan to relieve taxes on fuel-efficient cars stimulate the manufacturing industry?

Craig H questioned:

I’m about to enter a fleeting concise on the most vital fiscal come forth, in my attitude, a propos the imminent Canadian appointment. I’m aware that many in the US are not all that well versed in the fiscal reputation’ of Canada, but this hypothesis can just as basically be helpful to America.

Seeing as our vehicle manufacturing industry has slowed extremely rapidly in the contemporary months (including the layoffs of many thousands of employees), I was wondering if here is potential for a stimulation in this industry following a tax sate on the sale of hybrid vehicles. How, in your mind, may maybe this help/hurt the state?

As I see it, this relief may maybe set off the sale of these vehicles to potential buyers in the market for cars that consume less gas, which in turn would help give a new lease of life the manufacturing industry in view of the fact that the tax wouldn’t chat the amount of revenue industry generates, but very the amount of tax full in by regime (which may maybe then be recovered from these same companies/corporations due to the rise in vehicle manufacturing that had earlier been tapering); help to cut our dependence on unknown oil, ensuing in–if additional nations join in initiating policies such as this–lower oil prices for industrial use, as well as lower manufactured goods pricing in view of the fact that of those lowered petroleum expenditure; and lower food prices in view of the fact that of the privileged than-mentioned drop in fuel prices, helping to eliminate the bestow absurd transportation expenditure–maintenance in mind these are hybrid vehicles and therefore do not run on ethanol, which, as we all know, is aiding in the rise of food prices.

Anyone else aware of this statistic regarding hybrid cars?

Granderson questioned:

40% of the public who handbook hybrids are Republicans, 36% are Democrats. I’m wondering why it is then that Republicans are made out to be so anti-background when they’re observably compelling stuck-up strides than the Democrats to boost the background, at smallest amount in this watch. Are the Dems all talk and no action? Are Republicans more concerned with sinking our dependence on unknown oil for national protection purposes than with maintenance the background sterile?
“more republicans can Meet the expense of to buy those. they aint low-cost.”

35% of hybrid owners earn less than $40,000/year. But I guess those are ALL Democrats, huh?

“you fail to bring up the rest of the repubs that are driving the gas suckers celebrated as SUVs”

That’s a bunch of B.S. Just another one of many generalizations from a liberal about Republicans.

“Just wondering where you got that stat. from. I don’t dredge up a biased have fun affiliation question when I registered my car.”

Thankfulness for in effect calling me a liar:

http://www.autobytel.com/Metaphors/newsletters/november/7.html

And “DanC,” that goes for you too.
Again, here’s my “source” :

http://www.autobytel.com/Metaphors/newsletters/november/7.html

And if you uneasy to read the question you would Plainly see that I said “at smallest amount in this watch.” I made it abundantly obvious that I was referring exclusively to this one fastidious come forth, so why are you bringing up others?

Typical Liberal. You have no protection so you chat the subject.
Liberals: I even bashed the Repubs in my question by adage they don’t care so much about the background as they do about sinking our dependence on unknown oil and you were too wrapped up in calling me a liar to catch it. All you guys may maybe focus on was what you interpreted as a confidential attack (what else is new). Appealing assemble of public you are… mad, bitter, public.

Are you surprised the Bill O’Reilly supports Obama’s plan to increase auto fuel efficiency?

wooper questioned:

Last night on his show he said it was a excellent business and would help fall dependence on unknown oil.

What do you reflect of his observations?