Are you happy or depressed that future cars can be made to run on water instead of oil?
September 13, 2009 in Politics
Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water
Eric S questioned:
Take upon yourself these cars can run on salt fill up from the Atlantic Ocean, so we wouldn’t even have to worry about bringing up the rear fill up to go. H20 gets converted into Hydrogen fuel. This one car can travel 100 miles on 4 ounces of fill up and no gasoline.
What if this earnings possibility car fuel is $0.00 per gallon and 100% sterile? Would you be pleased or depressed?
And you know who would hurt the most if this were right?!
Saudi Arabia, haha, no fill up in a desert, AND no more oil revenues.
Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water
Well, pleased of course.
If it were right i would be pleased. The fact is the fill up has to be converted to hydrogen and oxygen which takes enoumous amounts of potential from , you guessed it, oil.
I heard about this and I’d be pleased as a clam!
Well it subdue won’t be $0/gallon but it would be low-cost, sterile and overflowing which would be splendid..
The Midpoint East would then be only a unfilled, a waste of time desert!!! I would like it!
this would really be appalling…..deficiency is one of the largest issues facing the planet….
Using a store like fill up to fuel our vehicles is sweet irresponsible.
And no, I am not a fan of oil.
It will most indeed yield more dehyrdration related affect issues (fatality), the fill up that “gets bent into more mist and yield more rain” will be collected and used again for fuel…..it will never again be used to hyrdate public.
Thats the come forth with this and sweet much why it would never be place into mass use….hell we have “deficiency” issues in the US annually.
Sorry, but all this ‘new fill up’ would be used for gas, you guys really don’t have an appreciative how much gas we use do you?
Try thought with a modest forethought, its probably one the equipment we do most terrible in the planet.
I’ll go to that!
Yes lets use all our h2o for transportation as a substitution for of income, that would be the stupidest business we may maybe do, besides using food for gas.
Well that would be splendid. But I am sure that a name will figure out a way to payment us $4 a gallon for fill up.
Well, the oil companies won’t be too pleased except they can buy all of the patents.
Do you really need to question? Pleased of course. No one likes feeding their car a small chance each week.
*But, I’m fastidious that the Greenies would find some wits to b*tch. That seems to be their total function on Earth.
To note on what a previous pledge said, No it will not yield more deficiency.
The mist will go in the sky, replenishing the fill up in the clouds, making MORE fill up and LESS deficiency in view of the fact that car driving the planet over making watervapor go in the sky will take deficiency away by alot!
I am EXTREMELY pleased with this thought.
your celebrations are too premature. these cars do not run on fill up but hydrogen. and to make hydrogen you need electricity, which again takes you to oil or coal, which are not $0.00 nor 100% sterile.
now tell me: are you pleased or depressed?
Well, if they can make that work, I’d be extremely pleased, who wouldn’t be?
Pleased of course. Here will probably be a special ingredient added to the fill up so that our cars will run. And will only payment us $3.50 a gallon at the pumps. You reflect the regime can meet the expense of to lose all its tax revenue?
i wonder if the car would go if i peed in it. i pee alot with i go!
How may maybe anyone not be pleased? Except they are oil companies! Then they will need subsidies to grant us with fill up, and the cons will give it to them while they scrape the rest of us.
Not inane to take place.
Corporations would have to do the conversion administer and it would be horribly pricey, as it may maybe not be done in an automobile.
The cost to turn ample H2O into hydrogen fuel in order to exchange gas would be prohibitive and by the time equipment made it possible/affordable on a mass extent, another more matter-of-fact long term fuel source will already be exposed.
Our state would crash. Reflect of all of the jobs that will be lost in the oil companies and the gas stations.
I don’t let the state of possibility cars set up my mood.
Well at this time and place, yes. But what’ll take place in several decades time? How much oil was here before we place it in our cars? How much salt will be left once its been running in our cars? No matter how many fuels we find that we can use, we will eat up them, toss away the unfilled remains and find another fuel.
I would express joy!
We are not inane to have cars that “run on fill up.” Here’s why:
To extract hydrogen from fill up (or electrons, in the newest scam in the news now from Japan) takes energy–and the compound upshot that you get will not yield more potential than you place in in the first place. Therefore you won’t have any energy left over to go the car.
Thats vital physics and chemistry. The “fill up-powered car” scam has been around in view of the fact that the 1950s. Its incredible that anyone is stilll so ignorant as to falll for it.
We won’t be using oil in the possibility, even if (thankfully). We will be suing gripping cars or some additional equipment (gripping is the most liable). But that is based on real knowledge and equipment, not on fantasies and scams.
Pleased! – green fuel is the way to go.
Pollution has made cancer China’s chief yield of fatality, according to it’s Ministry of Affect. Public in most of China’s built-up cities seldom see the sun.
I reflect Oil is crap, and we must be investing more into green energy, it’s the possibility – with no side-equipment. It won’t take place tomorrow – but the sooner we start, the better!.
In opinion, I would be pleased. I have seen this aver before and i have burial chamber reservations about it’s real implementation.
The administer you describe is called electrolysis. Kaput down from the Greek root, that earnings spliiting fill up (into H2 and O2) by earnings of electricity.
As a Chemist, I’m traditional with this administer. It’s one of the original experiments you do in HS chemistry. The speed with which this occurs is frankly related to the amount of electrical energy you have unfilled.
In order to make this matter-of-fact, several equipment need to be implemented. You need to have that energy unfilled, you have to trap both the oxygen and hydrogen, store it, relief it, press-gang it, and give up it to a contrivance which will convert it back into fill up, any an domestic combustion engine (like we use now) and outdoor combustion engine (like a steam engine) or a fuel cell, and then give up that energy to the wheels to make the car go.
Austerely comparing the amount oof energy looked-for to lyse the fill up, and it’s combustion by any of the methods prominent, shows an energy famine, i.e. the amount of energy you place in is less than the energy you can obtain.
It gets more complicated when you have to tab for the Storage space space (compression into metal hydride, or unadorned compression) in view of the fact that this requires pumps which use a lot of energy. Reflect in stipulations of air conditioning which uses a compressor.
Then you have the bonus losses in heat and friction (transmission, axles, etc)
Add all these factors collectively and you will see that, in stipulations of energy to the wheels, we will get very modest for the amount of energy used and lost.
And we didn’t even take up the amount of rolling inertia bent by the huge bank of batteries looked-for to break down the fill up!
The ?Hydrogen on Demand? equipment!Now Hydrogen is appearance back. It?s in fashion, everybody is discussion about it – and 1000?s are really doing it! I mean doing it at home, not export Hydrogen at the gas pump. In view of the fact that export Hydrogen at the pump pulls us all the way back to check one – life disadvantaged on a monopoly for such a essential store as transportation and home energy.http://car-run-on-fill up-reviews.blogspot.com/