Is there a legal disclaimer that the makers of “Hybrid” cars need to make about the risk of electrocution?
November 7, 2009 in Law & Ethics
Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water
Fedup Veteran questioned:
It seems that the “Hybrid” cars are perilous if they get into an accident in view of the fact that of the high electricity which flows owing to them. This earnings that EMTs and fire fighters need to ground the vehicle before charitable ANY kind of aid.
http://www.defrance.org/artman/publish/article_1426.shtml
Are they required to have public sign a proclamation clearing them of liability, if the self gets into an accident?
In view of the fact that Fixed cars don’t electrocute the EMT worker tiresome to get the self OUT of the business.
A couple weeks ago I saw an accident with a hybrid car and they made him handbook it to a parking lot where here were NO cars around. If the guy was severely hurt he would have been toast.
You can SEE a fire…you can’t see if a hybrid is hot, nor do you know if the car is twisted off or not.
Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water
In view of the fact that fixed cars are so inherently safe?
fs
how about cars with gas tanks? that gas may maybe leak out and catch fire…..
Hybrids – as is right with ‘habitual’ cars – are inherently unsafe.
For the like of God! Methane derives from the most uber-gnarly (gnarly FUBAR-ly) of all gnarlies!
And – agreed that such ‘gnarlies’ are so indefinitely overflowing – why don’t we just give methane a opportunity?
…
[the 'gnarlies' I submit to sail out the back ends of mammals, chickens, democrats and additional birds]