how does Obama think he is “helping” the economy by mandating fuel-efficeny standards for vehicles, which wil?
November 8, 2009 in Elections
Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water
Cierra E Wight questioned:
in view of the fact that here is no way (at smallest amount not to my information) to chat all of the cars that are now on the road and do not meet the principles that Obama described, I can only take upon yourself that Obama austerely earnings that all new cars that are bent from now on have to meet fastidious fuel efficiency principles. But with the auto industry barely lynching on by a thread as it is, on top of the probable cost of the new vehicles, does Obama really reflect anyone is inane to (be able to) hold any of these new vehicles, in any case of their fuel efficiency? Similarly, here are literally millions of unsold new cars that do not have this figure which continue to be unsold out here right now. This begs the question of what will take place to these cars, on which by the way billions of tax $/bailout cash was washed-out. So my question is why on earth would Obama break down even MORE $ to be washed-out on fuel efficiency vehicles if these vehicles will more than liable remain unsold due to the state. Obama force want to save the auto industry, but he better be prepared to kiss it goodbye when the bread tanks and inflation hits, which will no skepticism surrounded by a few months of this.
Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water
Obama thinks public are too stupid to make the choices that are right for their fastidious wants.
That manure between his ears causes him to not reflect plainly…
Having automakers boost fuel efficiency expenditure them more cash. Which in turn will cost customers more cash. Consuming less fuel also expenditure oil companies in profits. No part of this bid helps the state, this is why it’s not been done, and why it takes a name as green as him to aim that we do it.
Not that I’m cheering that we keep making inefficient cars and charitable our cash away to oil companies; I don’t, but facts are facts.
Here are now gripping cars that can do 140 miles per hour. Your pathetic Republican fossil ideology isn’t effective any more.
Rejoinder to Pfo The oil companies are a dying breed. Your pathetic “Drill baby drill” slogan was just as pathetic as each additional thought you morons had in the 2008 campaign
Rejoinder to “Typo” When these cars are built in mass numbers they will become low-cost. Something that horrifies the oil companies.
ever been in south georgia? here are some ancient ass cars on the road down here…lol…half this town voted obama we are evenly tear ethnically…and all the stickers etc tell me they did…as do the stickers for the opposition tells me what the additional half of the public voted…most of this town is on foodstamps i dont see any black public here driving huge SUVS or the margin of them driving a car at all
Hey by Question-those cars you are discussion about run somewhere form $65,000 to $250,000.
So how may of us can meet the expense of that?
Besides, it just gives him another defense to take over the auto manufacturers.
The equipment exists to make fuel-efficient cars. It’s just not cost-effectual to chat over production to make them.
I don’t ever intend to buy an gripping hybrid.
But I WILL buy a compressed air hybrid.
A car already exists than can go 100 miles on one tank of compressed air lonely. (4,000 lbs of air in a carbon-structure tank). Add a small gasoline hybrid engine to payment the tank and 1,000 miles on a tank of gas isn’t an unjust guesstimate.
unreliable the principles, that are typically unfeasible, are about as gifted & excellent for the state as “cap and trade” taxes are. In additional words – Really Terrible! When is this twit inane to gather?
GENIUS!!! You have figured out the EVIL Diplomacy!!!
SHOCKING!!!
Republicans make me laugh……….
I thought Detroit was on board with this?
Snivel somewhere else.
Does he reflect he is helping ….yes he does
he is looking forwards…such a chat
Come on why are so many cons hostile to ANY chat…we need a ordinary all across the states not just here and here
It will not take place until 2016….time to go on
Lets go………….
What a fresh and refreshing thought, A name who can really read between
the Obama lines. Have you also noticed, that none of his legislation apart from
for the outrageous costs programs take place now or even two being
from Now. Everthing this fool does is a 10 year down the road plot.
So if it all bombs out, which it will. He can hold responsible it on additional public. which
is really all he is excellent at.
He has shown no appeal in reduction the car industry or our state. As a substitution for, the question must be who’s appeal was he serving with these new principles. Maybe the Italian car company Fiat that just got Chrysler for free and passes off golf carts for cars. That begs the question of who owns Fiat or very who just bought have a give of in it. It also helps the battery producers of the gripping cars which GE just bought into. Did you forget the chuck of stimulus bill that is inane to updating the regime fleet with eclogues. It also helps to play into the eco crowd to keep his popularity up. Inflating the bread and bankrupting us will give him the wits to go us into the planet currency base monitored by the IMF. The UN will be the governing base. I guess he bought himself a huge vote with the Italians when he runs for head of the UN in 4 being. That would be with he cryptogram over our sovereignty threw treaties with the UN.
Of course, I am just another right wing radical clinging to my guns and God who doesn’t see how Obama is inane to save us from ourselves.
Buy a diesel in view of the fact that you can run that off of cooking oil.
Don’t you get it. He doesn’t care what the public reflect, he is now running the auto industry, he and the unions, this is only one business, we are bringing up the rear our civil Civil rights each and everyday. You will at some top get to choose between on foot or riding in some unsafe car that most of us will not be able to meet the expense of anyhow. This total mess is ludicrous. I hope we get to see an appointment in 2010.
maybe (for once) some observations without name calling and cataloging.
The thought is called negotiate..AND setting principles that we may not meet next week. Maybe not next year.
I have a “clunker” (ie used) suv, but NO apologies.. you can’t fit a wheelchair in a mini car. OF THE CARS OUT Here Now.. 10-15 yrs from now, they will die.
A name will buy the new cars..if for no additional wits, than they take place to judge in helping the pollution problem, and better mileage. The cost of gas will be cheaper to help offset the price of the vehicle.
The new give out here now… it will go. Slower, but it will. The new ones won’t be out for a few being, so A name will be export them.
The bottom line is that a name wants to reflect additional than just the bread.
As for the bestow state.. that is not top surprise to the auto industry,but they are suffering for a diversity of reasons. One life the lack of additional jobs.. which he IS Tiresome TO HELP. Did you know that of the stimulus cash.. it has been voted. Much of that is pot necked by states that are failing to use it.
Just some alternate view that you can deliberate. You force even set up your sheath lack of sympathy (if you have it) and say..well, she has a top.
First off, it’s not about “fixing” the state NOW. It was never about that.
Fuel efficiency reduces our dependence on unknown oil and keeps more cash in our pockets.
The ordinary would only be helpful to new vehicles so those needing new ones in 2016 would benefit greatly. Don’t need or want a new car? Don’t buy one in 2016.
What’s your problem with that?