Does America need more checks and balances over congress?
Amber questioned:
With congress legislating all from medications doctors prescribe, to the fuel efficiency of cars, to even the set alight bulbs we use in our household…why did the founders not grant citizens with a way to legislate congress (minus voting each few being)?
Who would not want to work 20 hour weeks 6 months a year meanwhile making 150k a year, how can you stop abuses like this?
Is Science a threat to humanity?
Don’t Treed On Me questioned:
Global Warming
Abortion
Stem Cells
Recycling
Cloning
Hybrid / gripping vehicles
Carbon parameter
Where does it stop? What is experience to society? Scientists are out of hegemony and in bed with FAR-left. I am SICK AND Exhausted of these left-wing elitist with lab coats.
If the proposal goes thru to tax people on miles traveled rather then gas consumption?
Ana Stasia Nika questioned:
1)Why don’t they realize that those who travel more already pay more taxes via more gas consumption?
2) In view of the fact that hybrid drivers got a dual bonus:
a) when they got a tax break in view of the fact that of purchasing the car and b) less fuel consumption.
They travel the same roads we do but contribute less taxes due to less consumption of gasoline (a lot less inane to keep up roads)
Must the hybrid users be fined and exciting a fee when their batteries end up in a land-fill in a few being?
It isn’t dead – many states are compelling into account it.
Rather than screwing around with basically unproven electric cars, why doesn’t Detroit go nuclear?
The Day after day Elitist questioned:
Now that it seems the automakers will end up in receivership at smallest amount, why don’t we skip the stupid gripping hybrid jabber and build nuclear-powered vehicles? I’m dead serious – it would simple to drop a microscopic uranium hydride reactor in a passenger vehicle. Ford had the nuclear-powered Nucleon thought all the way back in the 1950’s.
Let the Japanese, Chinese, and Germans mess around with batteries and plug-ins. Let them build go-karts that can travel 200 miles without charging up – we’ll have 500-horsepower Escalades that can go a million miles without refueling or emitting a release small amount of carbon, and which would be greatly safer than riding around with 20 gallons of uber-combustible gasoline in a steel tank a few inches off the ground. Just infer what that would to give a new lease of life American industry and the state!
So, do you agree? Is is time to get serious and start building nuke-powered vehicles?
Brains,
Here is no source of potential that is completely devoid of risk. But, comparing nuclear with fossil fuels like gasoline, here is austerely no evaluation – the gasoline and diesel we now use is far more perilous.
buckmark,
I’m sorry to report that you know absolutely not anything about nuclear potential, as evidenced by your proclamation that a collision would upshot in a nuclear blast. At the very most terrible, here would be some insignificant radiation exposure, roughly equivalent to that expected in a couple of CAT scans. Even that isn’t liable, as it is completely realistic to sell something to a name a restriction mechanism capable of left over intact all owing to even the most terrible auto collisions.
Brains (again),
You wouldn’t need to refill, ever. A 1 kg uranium hydride fuel source would be excellent for well over 1 million miles.
Taxpayers gave Chrysler $12 Billion to develop electric car, Fiat kills it. Can we get money back?
Obama Hood – Apply the Wealth questioned:
http://www.foxnews.com/tale/0,2933,573126,00.html
Chrysler has disbanded a team of engineers dedicated to rushing a array of gripping vehicles to showrooms and dropped ambitious sales targets for battery-powered cars set as it was sliding headed for liquidation and in quest of regime aid.
The go by Fiat SpA marks a foremost setback for Chrysler, which had used its gripping car curriculum as part of the case for a $12.5 billion federal aid wrap.
As late as Distinguished, Chrysler took $70 million in grants from the U.S. Department of Energy to develop a test fleet of 220 hybrid pickup trucks and minivans, vehicles now scrapped in the sweeping spin plot for Chrysler announced this week by Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne.
Greed is good isn’t it conservatives? Forget global warming, isn’t a hybrid good cause it saves you money
Spartacus questioned:
on gas?
I reflect the image conservatives have of liberals is that they are all tree huggers and all this kind of stereotype.
They attack global warming and thats fine dude no matter what.
Lets take upon yourself global warming is a huge lie, and I’m not adage it is I’m just adage lets take upon yourself,
wouldn’t you want to get a car that would give you the best fuel efficiency?
Forget al gore and all this material about carbon and mercury emmissions, wouldn’t export equipment that are more energy efficient be better yield then you’d have more cash to buy equipment or donate cash to the republican of your extent whose running for office.
Greed is excellent!
Isn’t this solid proof that Bush is deliberatly betraying America for Oil Corp profits?
hacker_67_39_177_230 questioned:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/automotive_news/4232400.html
This composite hybrid car gets 300MPG and with solar cells on our rooftops which payment batteries in our garage we can give a new lease of life our cars overnight for free.
That this is not our energy plot proves that Bush is betraying America by protect Oil Corp profits as a substitution for of our own national wellbeing,
Come on 138 days when we get to use the Jingoist Act and the new illegal wiretapping to get all the prove we need in order to arrest, imprison, convict and Grab all the assets of Bush, Cheney and the Oil Body for treachery hostile to America, our soldiers, our state and our national wellbeing as the Midpoint East is MORE Perilous now that EVER BEFORE thankfulness to their deliberate antagonism in order to handbook up oil prices.
Why do cons deliberately talk stupid? The solar cells payment the batteries in our garage so we can come home and give a new lease of life from the batteries each night for free. Get it?
Batteries are these equipment that store electricity for use before long on?
Is this too hard for you? It really must be.
Isn’t this solid proof that Bush is deliberately betraying America so Oil corps can steal more profits?
hacker_67_39_177_230 questioned:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/automotive_news/4232400.html
This car which is a composite hybrid and gets 300mpg along with solar cells on our rooftops which payment batteries in our garage so we can give a new lease of life our cars overnight for free are all unfilled right now.
That this is not our national energy plot proves that Bush is deliberately betraying our national wellbeing for Oil Corp profits.
Come on 138 days when WE GET to use the Jingoist Act and the new Illegal wire tapping to get all the waterproof we need to arrest, prove, imprison and Grab ALL ASSETS of Bush, Cheney and all the Oil Body for the treachery they committed hostile to America, it’s troops, our state AND our national wellbeing as the Midpoint East is now more explosive that ever before thankfulness to THEIR ANTAGONISM of the Midpoint East to jack up oil profits.
Can you think of a better reason to spend 3 minutes contacting Ur Representative NOW?
Dr. Pharmacy questioned:
$50 million for the National Donation for the Arts
$380 million in the Senate bill for the Women, Infants and Children curriculum
$198 million for Filipino Planet War 2 vets and their families
$300 million for grants to combat violence hostile to women
$2 billion for federal outcome-care block grants
$6 billion for academe building projects
$15 billion for boosting Pell Grant college scholarships
$4 billion for job-schooling programs, including $1.2 billion for “youths” up to the age of 24
$1 billion for union-development block grants (ACORN)
$4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities”
$650 million for digital-TV coupons
$90 million to educate “vulnerable populations”
$15 billion for business-loss reside in-backs
$145 billion for “Making Work Pay” tax credits
$83 billion for the earned income credit
$150 million for the Smithsonian
$34 million to mend the Department of Buying headquarters
$500 million for enhancement projects for National Institutes of Affect conveniences
$44 million for repairs to Department of Undeveloped headquarters
$350 million for Undeveloped Department computers
$88 million to help go the Public Affect Service into a new building
$448 million for constructing a new Land of your birth Wellbeing Department headquarters
$600 million to convert the federal auto fleet to hybrids
$450 million for NASA (score-out for “climate-investigate missions”)
$600 million for NOAA (score-out for “climate modeling”)
$1 billion for the Attitude poll Chest of drawers
$89 billion for Medicaid
$30 billion for COBRA indemnity additional room
$36 billion for expanded unemployment benefits
$20 billion for food stamps
$4.5 billion for U.S. Army Body of Engineers
$850 million for Amtrak
$87 million for a polar icebreaking ship
$1.7 billion for the National Park Logic
$55 million for Historic Maintenance Fund
$7.6 billion for “rural union advancement programs”
$150 million for agricultural-commodity buys
$150 million for “producers of livestock, honeybees, and farm-raised fish”
$2 billion for renewable-energy investigate ($400 million for global-warming investigate)
$2 billion for a “sterile coal” potential sow in Illinois
$6.2 billion for the Weatherization Help Curriculum
$3.5 billion for energy-efficiency and conservation block grants
$3.4 billion for the State Energy Curriculum
$200 million for state and community gripping-transport projects
$300 million for energy-efficient-apparatus discount programs
$400 million for hybrid cars for state and community governments
$1 billion for the manufacturing of well yet to be batteries
$1.5 billion for green-equipment loan guarantees
$8 billion for innovative-equipment loan-look excellent curriculum
$2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects
$4.5 billion for electricity grid
$79 billion for State Fiscal Stabilization Fund
Is Obama using scare tactics to try to get the stimulus bill passed?
Obama Hood – Apply the Wealth questioned:
Obama has said that we are inane to have a cataclysm if we do not pass this pork laden stimulus bill. Why is he using scare tactics?
Obama was one to complain about Bush’s costs, but look at the pork in this bill. The bits and pieces contain:
List of all the projects we need or else we will never renovate your health!
$50 million for the National Donation for the Arts
$380 million in the Senate bill for the Women, Infants and Children curriculum
$198 million for Filipino Planet War 2 vets and their families
$300 million for grants to combat violence hostile to women
$2 billion for federal outcome-care block grants
$6 billion for academe building projects
$15 billion for boosting Pell Grant college scholarships
$4 billion for job-schooling programs, including $1.2 billion for “youths” up to the age of 24
$1 billion for union-development block grants
$4.2 billion for “neighborhood stabilization activities”
$650 million for digital-TV coupons
$90 million to educate “vulnerable populations”
$15 billion for business-loss reside in-backs
$145 billion for “Making Work Pay” tax credits
$83 billion for the earned income credit
$150 million for the Smithsonian
$34 million to mend the Department of Buying headquarters
$500 million for enhancement projects for National Institutes of Affect conveniences
$44 million for repairs to Department of Undeveloped headquarters
$350 million for Undeveloped Department computers
$88 million to help go the Public Affect Service into a new building
$448 million for constructing a new Land of your birth Wellbeing Department headquarters
$600 million to convert the federal auto fleet to hybrids
$450 million for NASA (score-out for “climate-investigate missions”)
$600 million for NOAA (score-out for “climate modeling”)
$1 billion for the Attitude poll Chest of drawers
$89 billion for Medicaid
$30 billion for COBRA indemnity additional room
$36 billion for expanded unemployment benefits
$20 billion for food stamps
$4.5 billion for U.S. Army Body of Engineers
$850 million for Amtrak
$87 million for a polar icebreaking ship
$1.7 billion for the National Park Logic
$55 million for Historic Maintenance Fund
$7.6 billion for “rural union advancement programs”
$150 million for agricultural-commodity buys
$150 million for “producers of livestock, honeybees, and farm-raised fish”
$2 billion for renewable-energy investigate ($400 million for global-warming investigate)
$2 billion for a “sterile coal” potential sow in Illinois
$6.2 billion for the Weatherization Help Curriculum
$3.5 billion for energy-efficiency and conservation block grants
$3.4 billion for the State Energy Curriculum
$200 million for state and community gripping-transport projects
$300 million for energy-efficient-apparatus discount programs
$400 million for hybrid cars for state and community governments
$1 billion for the manufacturing of well yet to be batteries
$1.5 billion for green-equipment loan guarantees
$8 billion for innovative-equipment loan-look excellent curriculum
$2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration projects
$4.5 billion for electricity grid
$79 billion for State Fiscal Stabilization Fund
Do we really need a $87 Million polar ice breaker? How is that inane to stimulate the state? I thought we were having global warming and the polar ice caps are melting. Is this just scare tactics or what?
FU – How is this a flawed list? This was posted on a web site by one of our push correspondents. I cut and pasted.
Will Republicans Support this effort in Congress? Or is it too Responsible?
courage questioned:
This Distinguished, the Senate and Household of government both voted for signpost bills that – if collective, will place America on the path to energy Independence and solving global warming.
Right now, members of the Household and Senate are effective to start a closing translation of the bill – which may maybe and must contain the best of both measures – that raises fuel efficiency principles to 35 miles per gallon and requires that 15% of our electricity be generated by wind, solar or additional renewable potential.
If Congress flips the batter, this bill will:
Cut 20% of our global warming emissions by 2030 and make significant progress on the long term reductions in global warming pollution that we need,
Save customers more than $25 billion at the pump and billions more on their home energy bills,
Bring a new sterile energy state to life – an energy state that, according to studies by the Union of Concerned Scientists, will keep and start hundreds of thousands of new, excellent-paying American jobs.
For Dems who say Reps may be a thing of the past: If so, will all Dems agree with each other or will there be?
At Smallest amount Hussein Kept us Safe questioned:
… domestic strife as in
1. current Dem senators from high coal producing / consuming industrial states who turn down to support carbon taxes
2. car producing Dem senators who turn down to support fuel efficiency principles and gripping cars in view of the fact that it would hurt the UAW
3. 70% of blacks in CA voted hostile to gay wedding ceremony. Will they now abruptly become pro-gay?
Are the mercury in compact fluorescent bulbs and lead and sulfuric acid from hybrid batteries considered green?
Ryde-On questioned:
Edit @ outside box, assess me if I’m incorrect, but public don’t consume and dispose of scores of fillings per household each year.
Will competition lower the price of gas?
hacker67_39_177_230 questioned:
Obama makes a honest top. An American uncommon energy plot which helps to develop and mass yield carbon structure hybrid cars capable of 300 mpg (Google “300 mpg” as this car DOES exist and will be on the market in America next year) and which can be rejuvenated overnight for free from electricity generated on all’s roof top solar panels / horizontal wind turbines all owing to the day and stored in batteries in their garage until used. That such a plot to promote and build this unfilled now logic would lower oil dependence, dramatically cut oil consumption and drop gas prices as proven by the republican’s aver that lower demand is dropping the price 40% these past few months.
Wouldn’t a uncommon energy plot like the one Obama is proposing start a struggle that would lower the price of gas forever?
Today the Post Office is raising it’s prices to reinvest the profits into itself, Do you agree with this?
hacker_67_39_177_230 questioned:
I agree, In fact I judge all regime must stay on the business model.
What business would allocate the oil, indemnity, health check, banking and pharmaceutical industries to pay no taxes?
I judge we must tax them at the rate where we can take the profits and use them to place into in America, like composite construction cars which weigh 1/4 less than steel but are stronger than steel. Tax incentives for horizontal wind generators and solar cells on all’s homes which give a new lease of life batteries in our garages all owing to the day for free so we can give a new lease of life our gripping hybrid cars overnight for free.
I say it’s time we adopt the business model in running our regime as a substitution for of the current welfare model where the chief most profitable corporations take cash from the regime without effective for it in the form of tax breaks.
What say you Modest Tall?
the rising oil dilemma who has the best solution, obama or clinton?
Cracker’s back questioned:
Clinton wants oil companies to contribute to a $50 billion fund to invest in uncommon energy; for car manufacturers to boost fuel efficiency principles and for the regime to tap into its urgent circumstances oil capital.
Obama proposes a $150 billion investment over 10 being in sterile energy and an 80 percent reduction in carbon emissions over 40 being.
IF YOU HAD TO PICK BETWEEN THESE TWO Diplomacy AND Not anything ELSE WHICH ONE WOULD IT BE
ty zordoz for answering it somewhat correctly
So-called “liberal Christians,” may I ask you a question?
Soldier of Zion questioned:
If you were open with rock-levelheaded, incontrovertible prove that our Lord Jesus Christ spoke English, would you support an English-first amendment to our Constitution?
FQ: Don’t you reflect it is our duty as Christians to boost the income principles of third-planet public, and don’t you reflect that that includes fossil-fuel convenience and efficiency? Only the most utmost eco-N?z?s deny the technological superiority of fossil fuels for cooking, heating and transportation.
Should windfall oil profits be taxed and used to fund alternative energy?
hacker_67_39_177_230 questioned:
The equipment already exists to make cars from composite clarification (thread and nylon cover) which is stronger than steel but weighs 1/4 less than steel.
Horizontal wind generators and /or solar cells on all’s rooftop will payment batteries in our garages.
Our hybrid gas/gripping cars would give a new lease of life for free overnight
and gas consumption may maybe basically drop by 75% for most city commuters. Many would never use the gas part of their hybrid at all.
The equipment already exists. All we need is a democrat in office who will implement a real national energy plot as a substitution for of a “By the oil corp, for the oil corp” plot that the GOP insists on forcing on us.
Would you willingly pay more for gasoline?
JohnGalt questioned:
If we taxed each barrel of imported oil, and kept raising taxes until the import flow stops, it would promote fuel efficiency, uncommon sources, and just commonly do what wants to be done. So if you had to pay an bonus 2 cents a gallon each month ($1 a gallon in 4 being), to wean our public off imported oil, would you support that thought?
Also, it would be appealing to note if you are (D), (R), or (I). I suspect this thought will have broad support.
Will the energy crisis of our time bring about the end of powerful cars?
Order In The Court questioned:
Even if I reflect we will HAVE cars for another hundred being at smallest amount, I suspect we may be income in the closing decades of cars of high horsepower. The budge to better fuel efficiency (thus less potential) in additional parts of the planet suggests this.
Do you agree with this normal? Why or why not?
Of course this is not to say we wont find a completely new way to potential vehicles, but apart from crude oil, i DONT see this a likelihood in the NEAR possibility…
