is it poosible to have a car without the engine and steering wheel?
September 16, 2009 in Bmw
Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water
saurabh a questioned:
i guess , such a car is indeed to come in possibility
Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water
yes in a junk yard
try toys R us.
Yes, why not. If you take a Hydrogen-Gripping hybrid, here is no IC engine in it and a car with out steering is also possible, I have done a project and i used a stick intead of Steering……
Here already is a car without a steering veer, I judge it’s a Mercedes thought car. It steers with a stick. And they have cars without engines – they’re gripping, and run with batteries and an gripping motor. (A motor and and engine are uncommon.)
Yeah but excellent luck being paid it around.
You may have to push it and no thought how you are inane to turn.
Why not just take wheels off too?
—–
No realy, you aren’t inane to be able to have a car with out an “Engine” in view of the fact that an engine is something that powers. We will have cars in the possibility with a uncommon earnings of an engine, but they will subdue need to yield potential. We will indeed exchange the gas engines we use now.
Steering can be done with out a veer how ever. But you would need to use another type of hegemony or something to that look. Additional wise you wouldn’t be driving at all.
No that’s the car of the past, the Flisntones foot powered mobile. ie you’re the engine and steering. Also the breaks if you don’t have a emergency brontosaurus rib bone glue.
Um…. I have an 82 Subaru wagon with no engine or steering veer. Makes it hard as hell to handbook even if
Many jurisdictions do NOT allocate a car on the road except the steering is frankly collectively to the wheels. I infer you may maybe have a tiller like the 1900 model cars used to – but the steering veer gives you more precise hegemony.
The dread is that if you use a “glide by wire” type logic – i.e. a stick and gripping or hydraulic motors – here are a lot more parts to go incorrect. A failure in anything, the wire relations, potential, the part that read the hegemony – abruptly you have a huge heavy cut of equipment inane in a honest line or veering into nearing conveying, with no way to hegemony it additional than brakes.
Even with now’s potential steering, if it fails, you can subdue hegemony it ample to aim where you want – such as pulling over to the side of the road. The tie is made with huge thick bolts and gears that don’t basically break.
As for the engine – something’s gotta make it go. Maybe you can have a baffle of batteries and gripping motors in the veer hubs, so that here’s no engine screened-off area to get in the way of how you want to top the interior describe…
In a few decades, maybe this may maybe be collective with pad hegemony, so that you have something like a Disney ride, where you get in, tell it where you want to go, and the pad does the rest. But, that’s a long way off; we want to be able to entrust the guidance and pad hegemony to admit unadorned obstacles. Humans can recognise debris in the road and steer around; or children who run in adjoin of the car, and brake. Computers cannot yet do that. They can’t even reliably handbook the road except it’s specially manifest with something like reflectors or a buried cable. (Reflectors – yeah – all conveying comes to a halt in view of the fact that the reflector post blew over…or it’s raining too hard, or here’s a set alight in the interval that looks like a proposition.
Shopping car….t in safeway you will see it, Not possibility, long time ago.