Does anyone remember the ideas during the 1980 to 90’s that used water to extend fuel efficiency?

October 1, 2009 in Alternative Fuel Vehicles

Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water

fuel efficiency

everymansmedium questioned:

The 20 mpg car gets 52 mpg by spraying fill up into the carburetor with rotating spray below the carburetor. Here were reasonably a number of articles. Then it just sort of departed like so many additional equipment like this. I followed up on it back then and found
Here were tribulations of unnecessary heat causing hurt to the engine. Only to be solved by very pricey engine upgrade. Also The car on a cold day caused a cloud of fog to form in back of it. from the fill up mist. This ment that the fill up would need to be recovered to prevent the fog problem. But the 260% boost in mpg was real. It force be time to look at this again. I bet the pattent is now expired.

Did you know that you can save fuel and run your car on water

Comments

6 Responses to “Does anyone remember the ideas during the 1980 to 90’s that used water to extend fuel efficiency?”
  1. Mike says:

    Really your in rank is completely flawed.

    I dredge up the contrivance. It was a fraud just designed to make cash for the promoter.

    This contrivance never may maybe realize those increases in gas mileage.

    Theoretically with by the book designed equipment you force be able to realize an superfluous one or two miles per gallon of gasoline.

    But you may maybe not realize even that with the contrivance as it was designed.

    It was just a low-cost contrivance that was never designed to work.

    It was just designed to make some instant cash for some quick buck artists.

  2. groingo says:

    I dredge up a fill up injection logic made by Shelby Spearco that emotionally caught up just surrounded by the air cleaner and when the engine reached a fastidious load it would spray a fine mist of fill up into the carb throat.
    It never did much if anything for mileage but it did reduce blow and carbon deposits.

  3. Noone N says:

    One word SCAM.

  4. afratta437 says:

    this is completely flawed.

    fill up absorbs btu’s when unreliable from liquid to steam (970 btu’s per pound, which is approx 1 pint)

    it doesn’t burn. otherwise we wouldn’t use it to struggle fires.

    the more btu’s your fuel (gasoline in this case) releases, the more work is accomplished (increased MPG).

    SO Fill up INJECTION Really REMOVES BTU’S FROM THE Upshot AND REDUCES MPG!

    fill up injection is used to cool the cylinder to prevent pre-detonation and/or detonation by absorbing btu’s that would otherwise yield the fuel to burn, or explode, uncontrolled (which is anytime it’s not lit by the flash plug).

    alcohol or fill up alcohol mixtures exchange some of the lost btu’s in view of the fact that the alcohol does burn and absorbs more btu’s than honest gas.

    the trade off is alcohol doesn’t contain as many btu’s per gallon as compared to gasoline.

    the cylinder can only hold so much air/fuel.

    if alcohol is in here, that earnings here is less room for gasoline.

    that earnings less mpg. but it force be de rigueur (especially in older non pad proscribed cars) to combat blow.

    knocking WILL end an engine

  5. Ted H says:

    No I don’t dredge up but it sounds like the scheme was (I have no thought if this is signal knowledge or not) that the head the the burning gasoline would start steam and start a more powerfull explosion in the cylinder. It seems to me but that you would end up lowering the like, sinking knocking but rising the amount of unburnt fuel in the exhasut, and maybe displacing oxygen with fill up. Appealing to reflect about anyway

  6. hungrykong says:

    Take note ‘bro for I’ve tried this before. I dredge up in the 80’s I had a container in the engine screened-off area and I had to mix 1 part fill up to one part ethanol. The hose collectively from the carburator to the intake many is bypassed and collectively to the top of the container where a tube is wrapped up to the bottom. Another hose to exact the bypass connects from the intake many to the second tube at the top. Only this time it is not wrapped up. When the intake starts sucking air, it will start a bubbling look and so mist is bent and eventually mix with the fuel from the carburator. This saves gas, cleans the engine, and increases the horsepower. I wonder if it facility for fuel injected engines too? Now you got me unusual…………

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...